State congressional Democrats threaten to ban abortion nationwide – The Nevada Independent

ByLance T. Lee

May 7, 2022

Hello and welcome to the Indy DC Download newsletter, a weekly overview of what’s happening in the nation’s capital as it relates to Nevada.

If a colleague or associate has emailed you this newsletter, please Click here to sign up and receive your own copy of Indy DC Download in your inbox

Facing a tough election in November, state congressional Democrats are seeking to energize their grassroots voters as the Supreme Court is set to strike down the constitutional right to abortion.

Rep. Dina Titus (D-NV), who represents the state’s 1st congressional district, which includes the Las Vegas Strip, said abortion is a key issue for her constituents. Titus is seeking re-election this year and faces a Democratic challenger, Amy Vilela, who is heading into the primary election.

In an interview, Titus noted that Nevada voters in a 1990 referendum enshrined in state law the 1973 Supreme Court ruling known as the Roe vs. Wade, which ruled that women had a constitutional right to abortion. Only another statewide referendum could overturn abortion rights up to 24 weeks pregnant.

“They don’t want that to change,” Titus said of his constituents.

But she said if more anti-abortion Republicans are elected, a federal ban could be considered, which would pose a threat to state law.

“That should probably be resolved in court,” Titus said.

In this scenario, whether the state chooses to defend the law could depend on the governor and the attorney general, two positions also contested in November. An anti-abortion governor and attorney general might be less willing to defend state law.

The two top GOP gubernatorial candidates, Dean Heller and Joe Lombardo, expressed their moral opposition to abortion. And during a debate on Thursday, the two leading Republican candidates for attorney general, Sigal Chattah and Tisha Black, who both describe themselves as pro-lifers, said they would not champion policies they did not support. not. Democratic Governor Steve Sisolak and democrat Attorney General Aaron Fordwho are both seeking re-election, issued statements supporting deer.

Abortion restrictions are expected to disproportionately affect women of color and low-income women, “and that would be a big part of my constituency,” Titus said.

Titus also pointed out that weakening federal protections would make Nevada a haven for those seeking abortions, which could strain state resources. Until 26 States would likely impose bans, according to advocacy group the Guttmacher Institute, should deer be set aside, as the court contemplates in the draft notice first disclosed by Politics.

“It’s about controlling women.”

While the race of Titus is classified as “skinny democrat” by tipsters, Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), Rep. Susie Lee (D-NV), and Rep. Steven Horsford (D-NV) all face tougher re-election bids. Their runs are classed as “hits” by most election tip sheets.

Speaking to abortion rights group Emily’s List on Tuesday, the day after the Supreme Court article was published, Cortez Masto also sought to nationalize the issue.

“Make no mistake, this is about controlling women,” she said. “Government officials across the country, many of whom don’t even know how women’s bodies work, will tell us when we can see a doctor and when we can’t.”

The first-term senator race is expected to be one of the most intensely contested in the election cycle. The GOP sees Nevada’s Senate seat as ripe for the picking given the Democrats’ narrow margins of victory in recent cycles — around 2% for Cortez Masto and Hillary Clinton in 2016 as well as President Joe Biden in 2020.

Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-NV), who won’t be on the ballot again until 2024, also participated to help get the word out to voters. Rosen is chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) Women’s Network for the 2022 cycle, which helps elect more women to the Senate. The DSCC is the campaign arm of the Senate Democrats.

In an interview on MSNBC’s Morning JoeRosen said electing more Democrats to the Senate would help stave off any national threat to abortion rights posed by a Republican-controlled chamber.

Protests across the country have erupted following the unprecedented leak of the Supreme Court’s draft opinion. Asked what these protesters might do, Rosen replied, “Take that fear, that anger, that worry and turn it into action. How do they do this? They are mobilizing at the ballot box. They are mobilizing to be sure that we retain our majority. “

Lee and Horsford also intervened.

“In 1990, the people of Nevada came together and voted by a 2-to-1 margin to protect a woman’s right to choose,” Lee said on Twitter. “But Washington Republicans don’t care. They will ban abortion nationwide as soon as possible. They are disconnected, offline and ready to take control of our personal health care decisions.

Horsford called for “federal protections.”

“[W]Without federal protections, many states will deny women this right. We cannot allow this to happen,” he said on Twitter.

Senate vote

But with the Senate split 50-50 between the parties, passing federal legislation codifying abortion protections is unlikely. Sixty votes are needed to defeat a filibuster in the Senate, and not 10 Republicans would join Democrats in passing such a bill.

Both Cortez Masto and Rosen have said through their offices that they would be open to filibuster reform to address the problem. But Democrats also don’t have the 50 votes needed to change the procedure for bypassing a filibuster. And Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) said he would not support such a move. Cortez Masto and Rosen said they would not support adding Supreme Court seats to secure a more favorable ruling, which some Democrats, including Representative Adam Schiff (D-CA), suggested.

Democrats also disagree among themselves on abortion. The Senate voted in February on a similar abortion rights bill, but it failed 46-48, with Manchin voting with the GOP opposing the measure, known as the Women’s Health Protection Act. Two Republicans, Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), support abortion rights but voted against the legislation because they said it went too far. The Democratic-controlled House approved the bill in September.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said the Senate would vote on an abortion bill next week, likely Wednesday, despite the failed vote. Wednesday’s vote is also expected to fail, but Schumer is aiming to get Republicans to register, which will likely become fodder for political ads.

Immigration and Title 42

Cortez Masto traveled to the White House on Wednesday with the other three Latino Democrats in the Senate. They urged Biden and administration officials to take immediate action to protect those brought to the United States illegally as children, known as DREAMers, holders of Temporary Protected Status (TPS). and immigrant families currently living in the country.

“We engaged with the President in a productive discussion and are pleased that he was receptive to our ideas for executive action that would provide temporary legal status to these communities,” the group said in a statement.

Although bipartisan talks on a possible immigration bill are underway among members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the group argued that the talks are unlikely to produce legislation for some time, if at all. , immediate action is therefore needed, while a more permanent agreement can be worked out.

The meeting came as Rosen asked Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas for a closed hearing on the department’s plan to stem the tide of illegal border crossings after Title 42 was lifted. .

Title 42 is a public health law the administration uses to quickly deport migrants to prevent the spread of COVID-19. But it has also made it harder for migrants to seek asylum. Biden announced the administration would stop using that authority on May 23. This decision should increase the number of cross-border commuters.

Mayorkas, who appeared before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said the plan he released last month was deliberately written in broad strokes so as not to warn drug cartels and traffickers. .

Rosen said such a hearing would allow senators on the panel to have their questions answered without “bad actors knowing about your plans.”

Rosen, Cortez Masto and other Democrats criticized the DHS plan.

For a full look at the measures delegates supported or opposed this week, see The Nevada IndependentCongressional vote tracking and other information below.

SEN. Catherine Cortez Masto

Co-sponsored legislation:

S.4150 – A bill to allow federal law enforcement officers to purchase service weapons upon retirement, and for other purposes.


Co-sponsored legislation:

HR 7660 – RAISE law of 2022

Source link